Friday, September 4, 2009

A Double Standard on the Texas Science Standards

GUEST POST by Ze'ev Wurman

In this week's Ed Week, Jonathan Osborne, a Stanford Ed School prof., has an interesting article on teaching science in Texas.

Prof. Osborne seems unhappy with the proposed Texas science standards, which chose to promote scientific inquiry and through inquiry, activities that are probably aimed at chipping away at the theory of evolution.

Now, I agree with Osborne that an effort to promote "scientific" chipping away at evolutionary theory is a fool's errand. However, the Texas School Board's approach to this issue, is -- on the face of it -- quite difficult to attack.

The proposed standards say that students

"In all fields of science, analyze, evaluate, and critique scientific explanations by using empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and experimental and observational testing, including examining all sides of scientific evidence of those scientific explanations, so as to encourage critical thinking by the student."

Based on exactly this statement, it is comparatively easy for a good science teacher to clearly show why from a scientific point of view creationism or intelligent design do not meet the basic criteria of scientific theories.

Sad to say, many teachers, in Texas and elsewhere, are not up to this task, and some may (mis)use the proposed language to attack evolution. But that is probably also true for many other, less controversial, aspects of science--that teachers may mischaracterize or give incorrect explanation of natural facts due to insufficient knowledge.

Be that as it may, Prof. Osborne chose to attack the language in the Texas science standards based on the argument that learning science, and doing science, are quite different things, and that some inquiry, reasoning, and critiquing skills are not really necessary for school children and inappropriate in a K-12 learning environment. This stance is rather peculiar, given that Prof. Osborne clearly likes and approves of inquiry-based education--at least so long as it does it not stray into a critical thinking or scientific reasoning about evolution.

Hence we find Prof. Osborne saying:
"[T]he capability to analyze and evaluate scientific explanations is one of the primary skills required of the scientist, not the high school student of science" (emphasis in original).

He gives as an example:
"[A]s [evolution] lies beyond criticism, it is hard to see what value any attempt to evaluate critically the evidence and the logical reasoning on which it rests would serve."

Yet at the same time, Prof. Osborne says:

"Offering students insights into the evidence for the many strange beliefs we ask them to accept--that we live at the bottom of a sea of air, that there is force of gravity in space [...]--is vital if science is to convince [...]"

Prof. Osborne has a double standard on the standards. His writing puts politics rather than rational thinking first, and thereby muddles things. He essentially says that empirical evidence and its critical evaluation is important in science -- except when it comes to theories that are more difficult to defend or are politically uncomfortable. It would be better to treat those theories as dogma.

Somewhat peculiar, coming from a science educator.


  1. Really don't know about this all thanks for kept me updated..!

    Term papers within deadlines.

  2. Hmmm, controversial topic. Thanks for posting this.

  3. This information is very interesting, I really enjoyed, I would like get more information about this, because is very beautiful, thanks for sharing! costa rica investment opportunities

  4. Hello .. firstly I would like to send greetings to all readers. After this, I recognize the content so interesting about this article. For me personally I liked all the information. I would like to know of cases like this more often. In my personal experience I might mention a book called Generic Viagra in this book that I mentioned have very interesting topics, and also you have much to do with the main theme of this article.

  5. Great post, I enjoyed ready reading it, Keep posting good stuff like this.

  6. Science is wast field of the world which is becoming more and more day by day.Cheap research paper|Affordable research paper|Write my research paper

  7. Thanks for the article. Very interesting

  8. your proposed standards was so informative for me, the article was also so good, thanks for informative blog.

  9. Prof.Osborne says very well,the capability to analyze scientific explanations is one of the primary skills required of the scientist,not the students has ability to perform this duty.Thanks for such a great post.

  10. I am agreed with research papers that prof.Osborne says very well,its a great article to read and i learn so many things from this scientific fiction.

  11. I was very pleased to find this site. I wanted to thank you for this great read!!

  12. I found this read interesting like all wordings of professor he explains every thing in a very well manner.

  13. Thanks for this its a great news for all Americans that US government started paying attention on educational issues.

  14. Hi, this is first time i am visiting your site and happy to see such a great article here, so many things new i came to know by your article. Thanks for all your efforts you made here for us. Will back soon for more updates.

  15. Thanks for the best was very useful for me.keep sharing such ideas in the future as well. Thanks for giving me the useful information. I think I need it!
    pacman games |happy wheels games |little pony games | unblockedgames
    friv 4 kizi4| unblocked games unblocked games for kids
    madness project nexus hacked
    happy wheels hacked

  16. Nice information. Thanks for sharing this article. It helps me much :) Please keep sharing us the newest information :)
    car games | racing games | online games

  17. This is a great article. Your information is very rich, it helps me have more knowledge about life. I'll share this article with my friends.
    girlsgogames l coolmath4kids l kizi l unblocked games l jogos de friv l jogos do friv l juegos de autos gratis l jogos do pou l juegos de los simpson l game for kids online l unblocked games

  18. Truyen ngon tinh hay la the loai truyen tinh cam
    Truyen teen hay la nhung truyen tinh yeu tuoi teen
    Don doc tai trang doc truyen online.

  19. The article posted was very informative and useful
    thanks for sharing..
    jaring futsal | jaring golf | jaring kassa / jaring polynet | jaring pengaman proyek | jaring pengaman bangunan | jaring pengaman gedung | jaring gawang | jaring paranet / jaring tanaman | rumput sintetis / rumput futsal |
    tangga darurat | jaring cargo | agen jaring | jaring outbound | jaring truk | tali tambang

  20. Hotmail is an email account of Microsoft Corporation. Like Google's Gmail, it is full of features usually xuyen.Neu of an email you want to register an account please follow these basic steps:
    Hotmail login

    Hotmail review

    Sign in to hotmail

    Log in to hotmail

    Recover hotmail password

    Tank Trouble is a very interesting flash game about tanks, about war and about destruction

    One Penguin Takes it personally when he is surfing the web and stumbles upon a web site telling him that he cant fly, after that he sets his mind to research and practice flying until he can prove the world that he can..
    Slitherio | LEARN TO FLY | LEARN TO FLY 2

    Strike Force Heroes is a new game action-packed shooter from the creators of Raze; with 3 game modes, 15 campaign missions and over 65 weapons.
    Strike Force Heroes | Strike Force Heroes 4

  21. I was working and suddenly I visits your site frequently and recommended it to me to read also. Age Of War 2
    Big Farm | Slitherio
    Tank Trouble | Happy Wheels
    Goodgeme Empire |

  22. We experience more than happy about that. You should also consider their finest game titles with our free currently to find the sense of exciting that brings.
    happy wheels | friv | girlsgogames | games2girls | happy wheels